Prompt สำหรับ Rewrite the paper.

Rewrite paragraph

Rewrite the following sentence in simpler terms and make sure this sentence is easier to understand for a non-expert:

Rewrite this paragraph to be more formal and use a professional tone and academic style. Use industry-specific language and terminology, provide detailed and accurate information, and support argument with statistics, research, and expert opinions:

Revise this paragraph for proper spelling and grammar:

Retype the same document and add citations (2020 - 2023) after each sentence about relevant:

Rewrite section

I am writing the Methodology section. Please provide one introductory sentence before this paragraph:

Summarize both paragraphs into one paragraph:

Write one sentence in transition to connect smoothly between the first and second paragraphs.

First paragraph:

Second paragraph:

Rewrite paper

Analyze the structure of this introduction section 
Topic: 
Predicting spatial and temporal variability in crop yields: an inter-comparison of machine learning, regression and process-based models
Introduction:
Understanding climate impacts on crop yields is fundamental for enhancing agricultural resilience in a changing climate. Numerous studies have been conducted for assessing the impacts of climate change on crop yield at the regional and global scales (Olesen and Bindi 2002, Jones and Thornton 2003, Parry et al 2004, Tao et al 2006, Yao et al 2007, Schlenker and Roberts 2009, Reidsma et al 2010, Schlenker and Lobell 2010, Bindi and Olesen 2011, Müller et al 2011, Urban et al 2012, Rosenzweig et al 2014). In general, high temperature exerts negative impact on yields directly through heat stress and indirectly via soil moisture deficits, while low precipitation tends to induce closure of stoma, reduction of carbon uptake and decrease of yields (Peng et al 2004, Schlenker and Roberts 2009, Butler and Huybers 2013, Asseng et al 2015; Ray et al 2015, Liu et al 2016, Zhao et al 2016, Schauberger et al 2017, Wang et al 2017).
Despite tremendous efforts to quantify yield response to climate variation, substantial uncertainties still exist in the estimation of climate impacts on crop yield (Asseng et al 2013, Wheeler and von Braun 2013, Challinor et al 2014b, Wang et al 2017), which can be attributed to the complexity of the relevant processes and the scarcity of relevant datasets. In general, two types of models have been widely used in the literature: statistical models (Lobell and Field 2007, Tebaldi and Lobell 2008, Zampieri et al 2017, Gaupp et al 2019, Leng and Hall 2019) and process-based models (Rosenzweig et al 2014, Waha et al 2015, Deryng et al 2016, Müller et al 2017). Whilst each approach has its own strengths and weakness, only a few studies have compared the estimates between statistical models and crop models (Leng 2017a, 2017b; Lobell and Asseng 2017, Roberts et al 2017).
For the most part, the focus of these studies, and inter-comparison exercises such as the Agricultural Modelling Inter-comparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP); (Rosenzweig et al 2013) has been on understanding the potential future changes in average agricultural yields given future climate scenarios. There has been much less attention to the impacts of climate variation and extremes, though these effects can be particularly significant for global food systems if they result in large reductions in yield, interruptions to supply and price increases (Gaupp et al 2019). Empirically characterizing the variability in crop yields is more challenging than characterizing general trends, in particular because extreme events are by definition rare. Furthermore, using crop models to characterize variability in time involves many computationally expensive simulations, whilst simulating variation in space requires high resolution datasets that may not be available.
Some more studies have recently examined the effects of droughts on agricultural production (Leng and Hall 2019) and the impacts of concurrent droughts in different locations (Gaupp et al 2019). Although these studies have addressed large food producing regions, they have not sought to characterize both the spatial and temporal response of yields to climatic variability. Better resolution of yield variations in space and time is needed in order to understand the risks of climatic variability for agricultural productions. Here, our hypothesis is that neither established crop models or conventional regression models are well-suited to this task. Crop models have been mainly used for understanding and simulating trends in crop yields and agricultural production (Elliott et al 2014, Rosenzweig et al 2014, Zhao et al 2017), in order to inform policy decisions, whilst regression models are traditionally linear, which may not be appropriate given the complex response of crop yields to external perturbations.
Recently, machine-learning (ML) has emerged as a powerful tool for environmental analysis (Chlingaryan et al 2018), as well as climate impact assessment on crop yield (Jeong et al 2016, Johnson et al 2016, Feng et al 2018, 2019, Cai et al 2019, Vogel et al 2019). ML often shows better performance compared to conventional linear regression models (Feng et al 2018), as it can capture non-linear relationships, handle the interactions among predictors and do not assume a certain shape of response function (e.g. linear or polynomial) (Breiman 2001, Shalev-Shwartz and Ben-David 2014). We hypothesize that these characteristics of ML will enable better prediction of variability of crop yields in space and time. However, a comprehensive inter-comparison of process-based crop models, regression and ML is lacking, especially for prediction of variation and extremes in crop yields in relation to spatially and temporally varying climatic effects.
In this study, we choose the US maize yield as an example to demonstrate the potential utilization of ML for assessing climate impacts on crop yields, through comparing the simulations by process-based models, regression and ML in a consistent manner. Specifically, the following scientific questions are addressed in this study: (1) How ML performs in assessing climate impacts on maize yields in the United States? (2) How large are the uncertainties arising from climate impact assessment models? (3) How the average, variability and extremes of US maize yield would change in the future under global warming scenarios? Through a county-level analysis, we aim to identify where maize yield estimation is most uncertain and where assessment of yield response to climate change is relatively more promising, thus providing critical information for climate risk assessment and effective adaptations.
structure:

Write a new structure following the above structure in the new topic:
Topic: 
Predicting Crop Yield Variability Across Fields Using Ensemble Learning with Regression Models
structure:

Rewrite the introduction section according to this structure, with 8 paragraphs.
Each paragraph should be formal, and use a professional tone and academic style.
And have transition sentences to connect smoothly between paragraph.
Please give me an introduction.

Structure:
Context Establishment:
Start by emphasizing the critical importance of predicting crop yield variability across fields for optimizing agricultural practices and ensuring food security in the face of climate change and other environmental challenges.
Literature Review:
Provide an overview of existing studies on predicting crop yield variability, highlighting the complexity of the task and the diverse methodologies employed in previous research.
Identification of Challenges and Gaps:
Identify the challenges inherent in predicting crop yield variability, such as the influence of multiple factors (e.g., climate, soil, management practices) and the lack of comprehensive models that can effectively capture these interactions.
Comparison of Model Types:
Discuss the different types of models used in predicting crop yield variability, including statistical models, process-based models, and machine learning approaches, emphasizing their respective strengths and limitations.
Focus on Variability and Extremes:
Shift the focus towards the importance of characterizing variability and extremes in crop yield across different fields, underscoring the need for accurate predictions to mitigate the impact of adverse conditions on agricultural productivity.
Introduction of Hypothesis:
Introduce the hypothesis that ensemble learning with regression models, by combining the strengths of individual models and leveraging their diversity, can provide more accurate predictions of crop yield variability across fields compared to traditional regression models alone.
Emergence of Ensemble Learning:
Discuss the emergence of ensemble learning as a promising approach for improving prediction accuracy in various domains, including agriculture, citing its ability to reduce overfitting and enhance generalization by aggregating multiple models.
Research Gap and Objectives:
Highlight the gap in the literature regarding the application of ensemble learning with regression models to predict crop yield variability across fields and outline the objectives of the current study, which aims to address this gap by conducting a comprehensive inter-comparison of regression models and ensemble learning techniques.

Introduction:

Suppose you are an expert agricultural technology professor assigned to review this document. Does it provide clear explanations? Are there reliable sources or statistics? Also, does it offer suggestions for improvement with step-by-step instructions for each paragraph or graph?

Document:
Predicting crop yield variability across fields is paramount for optimizing agricultural practices and ensuring food security, particularly in the face of climate change and other environmental challenges. The ability to anticipate fluctuations in crop yields enables farmers and policymakers to make informed decisions regarding crop selection, resource allocation, and risk management strategies. By understanding the factors influencing yield variations and employing robust predictive models, stakeholders can mitigate the adverse effects of unpredictable agricultural outcomes, thereby enhancing the resilience of food production systems.
A substantial body of literature exists on predicting crop yield variability, reflecting the multifaceted nature of this endeavor and the diverse methodologies employed by researchers. Previous studies have explored various factors contributing to yield variations, including climatic conditions, soil properties, agricultural management practices, and socio-economic factors. While some researchers have focused on developing statistical models based on historical yield data and environmental variables, others have adopted process-based models that simulate crop growth dynamics. Additionally, machine learning approaches have gained traction in recent years, offering novel ways to analyze complex datasets and extract predictive insights.
Despite the progress made in predicting crop yield variability, several challenges persist in this field. One of the foremost challenges lies in the complexity of interactions among multiple factors influencing crop yields, making it difficult to develop comprehensive predictive models. Furthermore, the inherent variability in agricultural systems, coupled with the occurrence of extreme events such as droughts and floods, poses additional hurdles for accurate prediction. Moreover, the lack of standardized methodologies and data interoperability hinders the scalability and transferability of predictive models across different regions and cropping systems.
Various types of models have been employed to predict crop yield variability, each with its own strengths and limitations. Statistical models, such as linear regression and time series analysis, offer simplicity and interpretability but may struggle to capture nonlinear relationships and spatial dependencies inherent in agricultural data. Process-based models, on the other hand, simulate the physiological processes of crop growth and development, providing mechanistic insights into yield variability. However, these models often require detailed input data and parameterization, which may limit their applicability across diverse agroecological contexts. In recent years, machine learning approaches, including neural networks, support vector machines, and random forests, have gained popularity for their ability to handle complex, high-dimensional datasets and extract nonlinear patterns from data.
Beyond predicting average crop yields, there is a growing recognition of the importance of characterizing variability and extremes across different fields. Variability in crop yields can have significant implications for farm profitability, risk management, and environmental sustainability. Moreover, extreme events, such as crop failures or bumper harvests, can have far-reaching socio-economic consequences for farmers and food supply chains. Therefore, accurate prediction of variability and extremes is essential for developing resilient agricultural systems capable of adapting to changing environmental conditions and market dynamics.
In light of the challenges associated with predicting crop yield variability, this study proposes the hypothesis that ensemble learning with regression models can enhance prediction accuracy compared to traditional regression models alone. Ensemble learning combines multiple base models, leveraging their diversity and collective wisdom to improve predictive performance. By aggregating predictions from different models, ensemble methods can mitigate the limitations of individual models, reduce overfitting, and enhance generalization. In the context of predicting crop yield variability, ensemble learning offers a promising approach to harness the strengths of diverse modeling techniques and improve the robustness of predictions across heterogeneous agricultural systems.
Ensemble learning has emerged as a powerful paradigm for improving prediction accuracy in various domains, including finance, healthcare, and climate modeling. By integrating predictions from multiple models, ensemble methods can effectively capture complex patterns in data and make more reliable forecasts. In agriculture, ensemble learning has shown promise for predicting crop yields, weather patterns, and pest outbreaks, among other applications. By combining the strengths of statistical, process-based, and machine learning models, ensemble methods can provide a holistic framework for predicting crop yield variability and informing decision-making in agricultural management.
Despite the potential of ensemble learning in predicting crop yield variability, there remains a notable gap in the literature regarding its application and effectiveness in this context. Previous studies have primarily focused on individual modeling approaches, with limited attention given to ensemble methods. Therefore, the objective of the current study is to address this gap by conducting a comprehensive inter-comparison of regression models and ensemble learning techniques for predicting crop yield variability across fields. By evaluating the performance of different modeling approaches using real-world data, this study aims to provide insights into the relative strengths and limitations of ensemble learning in agricultural prediction tasks, thereby contributing to the advancement of predictive modeling in agriculture and related fields.

Your suggestion:

Please rewrite following your suggestion